Skip to main content

Table 2 Baseline sociodemographic data of the study participants

From: The effect of USM-IAM-based counselling vs standard counselling on insulin adherence, FBS and HbA1c among patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM): a randomised controlled trial

Variables

 

Frequency, n (%)

p-valuea

Overall

(n = 180)

Standard Counselling Group

(n = 90)

USM-IAM based Counselling Group

(n = 90)

 

Age, years old

56.1 (7.96)b

57.08 (7.92)b

55.16 (7.93)b

0.483c

Sex

 Female n (%)

96 (53.3)

46 (25.5)

50 (27.7)

0.550

 Male n (%)

84 (46.7)

44 (24.4)

40 (22.2)

Ethnicity

 Malay

171 (95)

84 (46.7)

87 (48.3)

0.305

 Non-Malay

9 (5)

6 (3.3)

3 (1.7)

Education Level

 Primary & secondary (%)

100

47 (26.1)

53 (29.4)

0.368

 Tertiary (%)

(55.5)

80 (44.4)

43 (23.9)

37 (20.6)

Marital status

 Single/divorced/widowed (%)

17 (9.5)

12 (6.7)

5 (2.8)

0.054

 Married (%)

163 (90.5

78 (43.3)

85 (47.2)

Occupation

 Working

86 (47.8)

40 (22.2)

46 (25.6)

0.423

 Non-working

94 (52.2)

50 (27.8)

44 (24.4)

  1. aChi-square test
  2. bMean (S.D. (Standard Deviation))
  3. cIndependent T-test