| Â | HR (95%CI) | P-value |
|---|
Model 1 | 1.250 (1.215, 1.286) | < 0.001 |
Model 2 | 1.153(1.115, 1.193) | < 0.001 |
Model 3 | 1.096 (1.057, 1.135) | < 0.001 |
Model 4 | 1.097 (1.059, 1.137) | < 0.001 |
Model 5 | 1.093 (1.054, 1.133) | < 0.001 |
Model 6 | 1.088(1.049, 1.128) | < 0.001 |
Model 7 | 1.096(1.058, 1.136) | < 0.001 |
Model 8 | 1.096 (1.057, 1.136) | < 0.001 |
Model 9 | 1.093 (1.054, 1.133) | < 0.001 |
Model 10 | 1.089 (1.050, 1.129) | < 0.001 |
Model 11 | 1.091 (1.053, 1.131) | < 0.001 |
Model 12 | 1.089 (1.051, 1.130) | < 0.001 |
Model 13 | 1.089 (1.050, 1.129) | < 0.001 |
Model 14 | 1.088 (1.049, 1.129) | < 0.001 |
- Abbreviations: HR: Hazard ratios; CI: confidence interval; other abbreviations as in Table ​1
- Model 1 adjusted sex, age, height, SBP
- Model 2 adjusted model 1 + Fatty liver, habit of exercise, smoking status and drinking status
- Model 3 adjusted model 2 + ALT, AST, GGT, FPG and HbA1c
- Model 4 adjusted model 3 + TC; Model 5 adjusted model 3 + TG; Model 6 adjusted model 3 + HDL-C; Model 7 adjusted model 3 + LDL-C; Model 8 adjusted model 3 + Non-HDL-C; Model 9 adjusted model 3 + RC; Model 10 adjusted model 3 + TC/HDL-C ratio; Model 11 adjusted model 3 + TG/HDL-C ratio; Model 12 adjusted model 3 + LDL/HDL-C ratio; Model 13 adjusted model 3 + non-HDL/HDL-C ratio; Model 14 adjusted model 3 + RC/HDL-C ratio
- Models 4–14 show the correlation between BMI and diabetes when lipid parameters are included in the regression model
