Skip to main content

Table 3 Relationship between lipid parameters and incident diabetes

From: Lipids as potential mediators linking body mass index to diabetes: evidence from a mediation analysis based on the NAGALA cohort

 

HR (95%CI)

Model I

Model II

Model III

 

TC

1.29 (1.15, 1.45)

1.16 (1.03, 1.31)

0.94 (0.83, 1.07)

 

TG

1.61 (1.48, 1.75)

1.39 (1.25, 1.54)

1.22 (1.08, 1.37)

 

HDL-C

0.17 (0.12, 0.25)

0.37 (0.25, 0.54)

0.47 (0.32, 0.70)

 

LDL-CF

1.58 (1.40, 1.79)

1.29 (1.13, 1.49)

1.00 (0.87, 1.16)

 

LDL-CS

1.48 (1.34, 1.64)

1.23 (1.11, 1.27)

1.02 (0.91 1.14)

 

Non-HDL-C

1.55 (1.39, 1.72)

1.29 (1.14, 1.45)

1.02 (0.91, 1.16)

 

RC

34.45 (18.54, 64.03)

9.11 (4.45, 18.66)

2.23 (1.05, 4.71)

 

TC/HDL-C ratio

1.53 (1.43, 1.64)

1.29 (1.20, 1.40)

1.15 (1.06, 1.25)

 

TG/HDL-C ratio

1.39 (1.32, 1.46)

1.29 (1.20, 1.39)

1.20 (1.10, 1.31)

 

LDL/HDL-C ratio

1.63 (1.51, 1.77)

1.34 (1.22, 1.47)

1.17 (1.06, 1.29)

 

Non-HDL/HDL-C ratio

1.53 (1.43, 1.64)

1.29 (1.20, 1.40)

1.15 (1.06, 1.25)

 

RC/HDL-C ratio

11.45 (8.09, 16.21)

5.12 (3.27, 8.02)

2.67 (1.64, 4.35)

 
  1. Abbreviations: Hazard ratios; CI: confidence interval; other abbreviations as in Table 1
  2. Model I adjusted sex, age, height, SBP
  3. Model II adjusted model I + Fatty liver, habit of exercise, smoking status and drinking status
  4. Model III adjusted model II + ALT, AST, GGT, FPG and HbA1c