Skip to main content

Table 2 Distribution of dyslipidemia in different gender

From: Strong association between atherogenic index of plasma and obesity in college students

Variables

Total(n = 13082)

 

Male(n = 7415)

 

Female(n = 5667)

Normal weight

Excess weight

P

Normal weight

Excess weight

P

Normal weight

Excess weight

P

Obesity

Overweight

Obesity

Overweight

Obesity

Overweight

High TC

86(1.0%)

33(2.4%)*

41(1.2%)

< 0.001

 

27(0.6%)

25(2.7%)*

26(1.4%)

< 0.001

 

59(1.6%)

8(1.8%)ns

15(1.0%)

0.307

High TG

142(1.7%)

156(11.3%)*

159(4.8%)

< 0.001

86(1.9%)

131(14.2%)*

130(6.8%)

< 0.001

56(1.5%)

25(5.5%)*

29(2.0%)

< 0.001

Low HDL-C

1924(23%)

683(49.6%)*

1205(36.1%)

< 0.001

1299(28.3%)

525(56.8%)*

863(45.3%)

< 0.001

625(16.5%)

158(35.0%)*

342(23.8%)

< 0.001

High LDL-C

79(0.9%)

44(3.2%)*

61(1.8%)

< 0.001

37(0.8%)

37(4.0%)*

45(2.4%)

< 0.001

42(1.1%)

7(1.5%)ns

16(1.1%)

0.724

Dyslipidemia

2096(25%)

739(53.7%)*

1287(38.5%)

< 0.001

1363(29.7%)

564(61.0%)*

913(48.0%)

< 0.001

733(19.4%)

175(38.7%)*

374(26.0%)

< 0.001

Number of lipid disorders

1

1973(23.6%)

587(42.7%)*

1133(33.9%)

< 0.001

1286(28.0%)

431(46.6%)*

784(41.2%)

< 0.001

687(18.2%)

156(34.5%)*

349(24.3%)

< 0.001

2

112(1.3%)

130(9.4%)*

136(4.1%)

69(1.5%)

115(12.4%)*

114(6.0%)

43(1.1%)

15(3.3%)*

22(1.5%)

3

10(0.1%)

19(1.4%)*

11(0.3%)

7(0.2%)

15(1.6%)*

8(0.4%)

3(0.1%)

4(0.9%)*

3(0.2%)

4

1(0.0%)

3(0.2%)*

7(0.2%)

1(0.0%)

3(0.3%)*

7(0.4%)

-

-

-

  1. Method: Categorical variables were expressed as numbers and percentages.chi-square test was used to analysis. P for excess weight vs. normal weight. * means: P < 0.001 for obesity vs. normal weight. ns means: Not significant for obesity vs. normal weight