Skip to main content

Table 2 Logistic regression analysis on the association between GS and DN

From: Exploring the relationship between grip strength and diabetic nephropathy among U.S. adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a cross-sectional NHANES analysis

 

GS

Q1

 

GS

Q2

 

GS

Q3

 

GS

Q4

 

Ptrend

 

GS

Continuous

P

OR (95% CI)

OR (95% CI)

OR (95% CI)

OR (95% CI)

OR (95% CI)

Male

            

 Model 1

Ref

 

0.50 (0.33,0.76)

 

0.42 (0.27,0.64)

 

0.35 (0.22,0.54)

 

< 0.001

 

0.96 (0.94,0.97)

< 0.001

 Model 2

Ref

 

0.53 (0.34,0.81)

 

0.46 (0.29,0.74)

 

0.38 (0.22,0.64)

 

< 0.001

 

0.96 (0.94,0.98)

< 0.001

 Model 3

Ref

 

0.50 (0.32,0.79)

 

0.46 (0.28,0.75)

 

0.35 (0.20,0.62)

 

< 0.001

 

0.96 (0.94,0.98)

< 0.001

Female

            

 Model 1

Ref

 

0.58 (0.38,0.89)

 

0.49 (0.31,0.76)

 

0.30 (0.18,0.48)

 

< 0.001

 

0.93 (0.91,0.96)

< 0.001

 Model 2

Ref

 

0.66 (0.42,1.03)

 

0.54 (0.33,0.87)

 

0.31 (0.17,0.55)

 

< 0.001

 

0.94 (0.91,0.97)

< 0.001

 Model 3

Ref

 

0.67 (0.42,1.08)

 

0.57 (0.34,0.94)

 

0.37 (0.20,0.67)

 

< 0.001

 

0.94 (0.91,0.98)

0.001

  1. GS, grip strength; DN, diabetic nephropathy; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval
  2. Model 1: crude model
  3. Model 2: adjusted for age, race, marital status and education
  4. Model 3: model 2 + smoking status, drinking status, BMI, HbA1c, diabetes duration, and hypertension
Back to article page

BMC Endocrine Disorders

ISSN: 1472-6823

Contact us