Skip to main content

Table 3 The sensitivity analysis on the association between GS and DN

From: Exploring the relationship between grip strength and diabetic nephropathy among U.S. adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a cross-sectional NHANES analysis

 

GS

Q1

 

GS

Q2

 

GS

Q3

 

GS

Q4

 

Ptrend

 

GS

Continuous

P

OR (95% CI)

OR (95% CI)

OR (95% CI)

OR (95% CI)

OR (95% CI)

Male

            

 Model 1

Ref

 

0.60 (0.41,0.88)

 

0.35 (0.23,0.53)

 

0.37 (0.25,0.55)

 

< 0.001

 

0.96 (0.94,0.97)

< 0.001

 Model 2

Ref

 

0.59 (0.39,0.88)

 

0.38 (0.24,0.58)

 

0.40 (0.24,0.65)

 

< 0.001

 

0.95 (0.93,0.97)

< 0.001

 Model 3

Ref

 

0.62 (0.39,0.97)

 

0.39 (0.24,0.64)

 

0.42 (0.24,0.73)

 

< 0.001

 

0.95 (0.93,0.98)

< 0.001

Female

            

 Model 1

Ref

 

0.57 (0.38,0.85)

 

0.44 (0.29,0.65)

 

0.27 (0.17,0.42)

 

< 0.001

 

0.93 (0.91,0.96)

< 0.001

 Model 2

Ref

 

0.63 (0.41,0.96)

 

0.47 (0.30,0.74)

 

0.28 (0.16,0.49)

 

< 0.001

 

0.94 (0.91,0.96)

< 0.001

 Model 3

Ref

 

0.71 (0.44,1.14)

 

0.54 (0.33,0.90)

 

0.35 (0.19,0.64)

 

< 0.001

 

0.95 (0.91,0.98)

0.001

  1. GS, grip strength; DN, diabetic nephropathy; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval
  2. Model 1: crude model
  3. Model 2: adjusted for age, race, marital status and education
  4. Model 3: model 2 + smoking status, drinking status, BMI, HbA1c, diabetes duration, and hypertension
Back to article page

BMC Endocrine Disorders

ISSN: 1472-6823

Contact us