Skip to main content

Table 2 Quality evaluation of MINORS for the included non-RCTs

From: Effect of liberal glucose control on critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Year

A

B

C

D

E

F

G

H

I

J

K

L

Total

Luethi et al.

2019

2

2

0

2

0

0

0

0

2

0

2

2

12

Luethi et al.

2018

2

2

0

2

0

1

2

0

2

0

1

2

14

Di Muzio et al.

2016

2

2

0

2

0

0

0

0

2

0

2

2

12

Kar et al.

2016

2

2

0

2

0

1

2

0

2

0

2

2

15

  1. Numbers A-H in heading signified: A,clearly stated study objectives; B,Inclusion of consecutive patientss; C, Prospective collection of data; D, Endpoints appropriate to the aim of the study; E, Unbiased assessment of the study endpoint; F, Follow-up period appropriate to the aim of the study; G, Loss to follow up less than 5%, H, Prospective calculation of the study size; I, A control group having the gold standard intervention; J, Contemporary groups; K, Baseline equivalence of groups; L, Statistical analyses adapted to the study design