Skip to main content

Table 2 Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of prevalent T2DM associated with each score increase in DP

From: Mediating effect of TyG index on the association between glucose-lipid metabolism-related dietary pattern and T2DM: a propensity score-matched analysis

Odds Ratio (95% Confidence Interval)

Quartile 1 (Reference, n = 332)

Quartile 2 (n = 331)

Quartile 3 (n = 331)

Quartile 4 (n = 332)

P for Trend §

Principal component analysis

DP 1

    

 Crude model (Model 1) 1.00

1.44 (1.06, 1.96) *

1.42 (1.05, 1.93) *

1.90 (1.40, 2.60) ***

< 0.001

 Model 2 1.00

1.46 (1.06, 2.00) *

1.52 (1.10, 2.08) *

2.12 (1.53, 2.93) ***

< 0.001

 Model 3 1.00

1.36 (0.98, 1.89)

1.42 (1.02, 1.98) *

2.15 (1.53, 3.03) ***

< 0.001

DP 2

    

 Crude model (Model 1) 1.00

0.91 (0.67, 1.23)

0.98 (0.72, 1.32)

0.89 (0.66, 1.21)

 

 Model 2 1.00

0.91 (0.67, 1,24)

1.00 (0.73, 1.35)

0.90 (0.66, 1.22)

0.639

 Model 3 1.00

0.95 (0.69, 1.31)

1.01 (0.73, 1.40)

0.89 (0.64, 1.23)

0.581

DP 3

    

 Crude model (Model 1) 1.00

0.90 (0.66, 1.22)

0.95 (0.70, 1.29)

1.01 (0.75, 1.37)

 

 Model 2 1.00

0.89 (0.66, 1.22)

0.97 (0.71, 1.31)

0.96 (0.71, 1.31)

0.943

 Model 3 1.00

0.84 (0.60, 1.15)

0.99 (0.71, 1.36)

1.00 (0.72, 1.38)

0.756

Reduced rank regression

DP 1

    

 Crude model (Model 1) 1.00

1.22 (0.72, 2.05)

1.56 (1.19, 2.05) **

2.43 (1.78, 3.33) **

< 0.001

 Model 2 1.00

1.26 (0.74, 2.13)

1.68 (1.27, 2.23) ***

2.61 (1.89, 3.61) ***

0.001

 Model 3 1.00

1.33 (0.77, 2.32)

1.34 (1.26, 2.27) ***

1.69 (1.82, 3.58) ***

< 0.001

DP 2

    

 Crude model (Model 1) 1.00

0.83 (0.61, 1.13)

0.99 (0.73, 1.34)

0.74 (0.54, 1.00)

 

 Model 2 1.00

0.81 (0.60, 1.11)

0.96 (0.70, 1.32)

0.71 (0.51, 0.97) *

0.086

 Model 3 1.00

0.83 (0.60, 1.15)

0.88 (0.63, 1.22)

0.65 (0.46, 0.91) *

0.021

DP 3

    

 Crude model (Model 1) 1.00

0.88 (0.65, 1.19)

0.90 (0.67, 1.22)

0.75 (0.55, 1.02)

 

 Model 2 1.00

0.88 (0.65, 1.20)

0.90 (0.66, 1.23)

0.74 (0.54, 1.01)

0.079

 Model 3 1.00

0.91 (0.66, 1.25)

0.86 (0.62, 1.19)

0.73 (0.53, 1.01)

0.056

  1. § Trends were examined using the Cochran-Armitage trend test; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, **P < 0.001
  2. Model 1: Unadjusted model. Model 2: Includes adjustment of age, gender, household income, education, occupation, physical exercise, drinking, smoking. Model 3: Includes adjustment of age, gender, household income, education, occupation, physical exercise, drinking, smoking, family history of diabetes, obesity, metabolic syndrome. ORs and 95% confidence interval were obtained using multiple Logistic regression. P for trend values for the medians of each quartile of scores included in the multiple generalized linear models
Back to article page

BMC Endocrine Disorders

ISSN: 1472-6823

Contact us